ERPNext breaks at scale.
We build the systems that keep it running.
Observability, reliability, upgrade safety, and integrations for mission-critical ERPNext deployments.
ERPNext doesn’t usually fail loudly.
It fails quietly - until it’s expensive.
These are operational problems.
ERPNext doesn’t solve them for you. We do.
Emails stop sending. Syncs half-complete. Nobody notices until users complain.
Customizations rot. Teams freeze. Risk compounds with every skipped release.
Stock and ledgers slowly stop agreeing. Trust erodes quietly.
“ERPNext is slow” is not a diagnosis.
“Only John knows how this works.” John leaves. Incidents begin.
- SOPs live in heads
- Docs are outdated PDFs
- No link between systems and knowledge
Infrastructure and operational control for ERPNext operators
ERPNext is powerful. Operating it safely at scale requires tooling the core platform does not provide.
Know what ran, what failed, and why. Control retries, stuck jobs, and worker health - without digging through logs.
Quantify upgrade risk before touching production. Get evidence, a fix list, and a clear go/no-go signal.
Systems fail. People leave. Documentation rots. Atlas keeps operational knowledge alive and actionable.
- Runbooks linked to real systems
- SOPs that evolve with production
- Searchable operational truth
- Built for teams, not wikis
Generic monitoring explains servers. UPEOPulse explains ERPNext.
A backup that hasn’t been restored is a liability. We verify restores, not just schedules.
Syncing is easy. Correct syncing under failure is not. Deterministic replay, idempotency, and auditability.
Multi-tenant ERPNext requires discipline, tooling, and control. We provide the missing layer.
This is not for everyone.
- • Downtime is acceptable
- • Logs are “good enough”
- • Upgrades are an afterthought
- • Reliability is optional
- • ERPNext is not mission-critical
Why teams come to us
- • We work where ERPNext usually breaks
- • We think in failure modes, not demos
- • We design for upgrades, not just today
- • We care about evidence, not assumptions
We make it reliable, observable, and safe to operate.
Evidence first. Then execution.
We start by making your system observable, then remove failure points, then make upgrades and recovery repeatable operations.